BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | My details

Comments(2)

Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science

Nisa Bakkalbasi* , Kathleen Bauer* , Janis Glover* and Lei Wang*

Biomedical Digital Libraries 2006, 3:7doi:10.1186/1742-5581-3-7

Essential, but not yet sufficient study

adrian mondry   (03 July 2006)  NHS email

At last a formal assessment of an observation that many will have made before. As such, the study is essential. It is, however, insufficient in at least three ways:

- The number of subject areas is somewhat small.

- Possible solutions for a combined search are not discussed.

- The changes in Google Scholar and Scopus are only mentioned, but not explored in depth.

As always in science, this leaves the door open to continuation of the research... Enjoy!

Competing interests

no competing interests

top

Some serious bias

Wouter Geritsma   (12 October 2006)  Wageningen UR email

In your research you have included some serious bias by slecting only journals from JCR. With enahnced search skills it should have been possible to use a larger, more varied set of journals articles for you analysis. I blogged a bit more about this at http://www.wowter.nl/blog/2006/10/some-serious-bias-in-citation-counting.html

Competing interests

None declared

top


© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated < info@biomedcentral.com >   Terms and conditions